UNIVERSITY BEING MONEY MACHINE JUSTIFIES THE RANKING GAME CRAZE

-

 This is a repost from Soul of Univesity FB group on 17/8/2021:




Sometimes earlier our leaders made the grave mistake of treating universities as income generation machines.
Last year a minister proudly announced that Malaysia received RM13 billion (directly and indirectly) from enrolment of international students. I say, if RM13 billion is what you want, our rubber glove industry alone brings in that much in a year. Why nobody ask the ministry of defence or the ministry of health how much money they make? Everybody knows that their values are not measurable in RM.
Suddenly everybody forgets the real values of universities and started putting RM in the equation. Now every academics, every Vice chancellor has to think about income generation. This mistake further justifies the ranking game, as it is a marketing strategy to attract international enrolment, that is, to bring in more money. They argue, on top of paying fees, these international students also rent houses, buy car, buy groceries., beli nasi lemak, roti canai. (Itu yang jadi 13 billion tu). This is a sad justification for having universities.
Good universities strive on intellectual values, money comes into the universities because society see these values. Now universities strive to attract money, (e.g. over exertion to raise ranking); while their values are judged by how many nasi lemaks are bought by foreigners.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Intellectual crisis in Malaysian Academia: In search of an overall philosophy

-
Image
We often refer to the progress of western civilisations in terms of their contributions in science and technology. We believe if we can have access, or even replicate their technological advancement as well as achieve the same level of prosperity, we will reach the same status they enjoyed as developed nations. With relative prosperity that enabled us to acquire the best technology out there, the best infra and with democratisation of information, by right, we should be behaving and thinking like one. But yet, something is amiss. Our mentality, our culture, our politics, don’t seem to reflect one. Why can’t we do this? Do we lack the psycho-sociological make up to stand like one? (cite K Mahbubani, “can Asian think?”). Why don’t we feel like living in a developed society? We don’t behave like one, even worse, our collective way of thinking as a nation doesn’t seem to be beyond those of ancient civilisations, stuck in bygone era. If we look at our public dialogues more often than n
Read more

From Ubercab to Uber: The Needed Paradigm Shift in Malaysian Education

-
Image
When UberCab decided to ditch the word Cab from its name, it was a revelation in the importance of stepping back and doing less and not doing more. This is something that our education system in Malaysia can learn. We are at the time  when doing something different almost always mean doing something new, the idea of doing away with unnecessary baggage as a way to progress is almost unheard of. In 2011, when Uber CEO decided to change it's name from UberCab to Uber, one of its team asked "If we ditch the word Cab from UberCab, then we are Uber what?", as if Uber cannot stand on its own as a word. Nevertheless the company proceeded changing the name. The move was quite significant in the history of the company. San Francisco Municipal Transport Authority has been threatening UberCab with many potential lawsuits due to its unconventional practice in cab service. By getting rid of the idea of the company as a cab service, and reposition itself as a non cab service,  it simply
Read more

The Scientific mind and modern world crisis. (In search of an overall academic philosophy- part 2)

-
Image
In my previous article , I talked of the absence of an overall, cohesive philosophy for Malaysian academia. This time the focus will be on a particular philosophy permeating academic realm,  pushing out alternative paradigms aggressively. Instead of bringing about cohesion, it divides academia and degrades it into fragmented chaos. Philosophy is not a subject favoured by contemporary scholars. Any discussion bearing any abstract concept  would quickly be labelled "rhetoric" and not worth serious attention. What matters are real 'empirical' hard data. Swift judgement based on scientific data would be the hallmark of modern and sharp intellectualism. For academia, this is unfortunate. It creates the current crisis or paralysis currently infecting it. Ironically, for all the low admiration of philosophy currently in academia, it embrace one particular philosophy religiously. Admit it or not, this particular attitude highlighted above originates from A particula
Read more